Re your 14-year-old grandson who has 12 ‘fillings’ that need attention

GENRE:  Email letter

TO:  Councillor Diane Woods
Cc The Mayor, Deputy Mayor & Fellow Councillors
Various email Bcc list

AUTHOR:  Ailsa B

DATE SENT:   Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 1:37 AM

TITLE: Re your 14-year-old grandson who has 12 ‘fillings’ that need attention

STATUS: Awaiting response

UPDATES:  Please post all updates and comments in the LEAVE A REPLY section below.



2008.06.Analysis.HsSIF6.Fluorosilicic acid.Incitec Pivot

Abnormal bone growths from sodium fluoride exposure


Byron Shire Council
Bcc Member for Nudgee & Others

Dear Councillor Wood

It was with horror that I heard on Lateline (17/10/13) that your 14-year-old grandson has 12 “fillings” that need attention.

Teeth are a part of the skeleton:  they are the windows to the bone.  Imagine what might be happening to your grandson’s bones while his teeth are decaying?

Decades ago, I had a neighbour whose pre-schooler literally had a mouth full of rotten teeth (the worst I’ve ever seen).  Only a few years later, the child was diagnosed with a bone disease which necessitated him having both legs in plaster for a lengthy period.

His teeth and bone problems will not have been caused by a lack of fluoride.

It is likely that parental delinquency largely contributed to his problem via a lack of suitable dental hygiene coupled with a faulty diet supplied by a heavy-smoking, avowed “intellectual snob” who was a suspected wardrobe drinker – his mother!  Who preferred studying to putting wholesome food on the family table.

Fluoridated water will not solve your grandson’s future tooth problems; but it could lead to parental delinquency whereby his parents leave his dental hygiene to Big Brother’s care via the kitchen tap.

It is now recognized (but not admitted by the pro-fluoride lobby) that fluoride’s benefits are topical (on the teeth) not systemic (you don’t have to swallow it).

I much regret having given each of my children, for many years, a daily dose of fluoride (a p.o.i.s.o.n. – which is now proven to lower IQ).  One child has fluoride-damaged teeth (dental fluorosis) that crack easily.  One developed a bony growth on their lower jaw during childhood – such as humans or sheep can develop when chronically exposed to fluoride.  (Please see attachment Abnormal bone growths from sodium fluoride exposure and view the x-rays of both elbows of Darryl Turner of South Australia who drank fluoridated water while exposed for many years to sodium fluoride in the work place.  The x-rays show skeletal fluorosis!)

X-ray reveals a calcified ligament in my back which is likely to be from my own chronic exposure to fluoride.  One has only to browse through material safety data sheets for fluoridating agents to discover that “calcified ligaments” can be an adverse effect of such exposure.

One of my nephews, had fluoride tablets regularly throughout his childhood and then moved to fluoridated Perth.  His teeth crack easily (and his similarly medicated sister’s teeth chip easily).  He initially spent $10,000 on dental crowns which failed.  He was later quoted $30,000 to repair his teeth over 3 years and that is probably at least 10 years ago.  He, who has a science doctorate and is careful with his diet, has had thyroid cancer (fluoride is known to cause thyroid problems); and prostate cancer (fluoride is an established “equivocal carcinogen” {NHMRC 1991}).  While there is no proof that fluoride caused his cancers, it cannot be discounted as a contributing agent.  Further, thyroid cancer is rife in heavily-fluoridated NSW, especially in women.

If you grandson’s diet isn’t up to scratch, he will be more vulnerable to the toxic effects of fluoride than those who are well-nourished.  If he is iodine deficient (as many are) he has the potential to have “thyroid effects” from 4 to 5 times less fluoride than an iodine-adequate person (NAS/NRC 2006).

Please click HERE and note the diabolical effects that fluoride coupled with poor diet can have on bone architecture.  The link will take you to the text of an article that was published in the UK’s Manchester Guardian, 9 July 1998.

Recall Dr Robert Gammal?  The dentist who presented an opposing view to fluoride at Byron’s fluoride debate?  His mortgage does not require a sycophantic allegiance to NSW Health.  He is free to tell the truth about the adverse effects of fluoride – and about its lack of benefit when ingested.

Dr Gammal’s Healthy Dentistry website contains a graph based on World Health Organization dental data for 12-year-olds which is the gold-standard age for dental comparisons.  The graph shows the downward decline in dental decay (DMFT = Decayed, Missing, Filled permanent Teeth) over 40 years for fluoridated Australia, Ireland, New Zealand and the United States and for non-fluoridated (no salt fluoridation either) Japan, Belgium, Italy and Iceland.  The decline is virtually equal.

The West Australian in 2004 reported many “Toddlers as young as one year having anaesthetics to crown and remove rotten teeth.”  (Text supplied on request.)  News papers periodically report dental crises in fluoridated Sydney.  Kansas, 100% fluoridated, has reported a dental crisis.  Tasmania, 83% fluoridated, has the highest rate of adult toothlessness in Australia.

Please don’t subject any of your (or others’) grandchildren to a lifetime of treatment via their kitchen tap with a waste product of industry which contains heavy metals such as arsenic, lead, cadmium, mercury and at times, even uranium.  (See attached 2008.06 Analysis.H2SiF5. Fluorosilicic acid.Incitec Pivot which was gained under FOI an Adelaide dentist who is a former president of the ADA South Australia Branch.)

Please view Poisoned Horses.  They can’t lie!  Their Colorado-based breeder Cathy Justus ( Email: ) led a successful fight to end the fluoridation of her Pagosa Springs’ water supply as a result of the terrible effects the water was having on her animals.  Lactating mares were especially affected because of the high volumes of water they drank.

“Fluoride” is added to water supplies to treat people (not to treat water) to effect a biological change in their bodies.  Any medical practitioner worth their salt knows that “informed consent” means “informed consent to treatment”.  The pro-fluoride lobby cannot honestly deny that fluoridated water is a “treatment”.  Thus, the individual “informed consent” of each person is required before any individual can legally be given a treatment.

NSW Health actually has a Health Policy Directive (Document number PD2005_406; Publication date 27 January 2005) which lists “Requirements for the provision of information to patients and obtaining consent to medical treatment.”

If you vote to fluoridate others you will be violating this Health Policy Directive – an issue that is likely to soon become a bone of contention between the anti-fluoride lobby and a NSW Government employee.

If for no other reason, please think of the environment and vote no to allowing a cumulative toxic waste fluoridating agent to be imported then released into the Byron Shire’s environment forever and a day.

Yours respectfully

Ailsa B
Australian Fluoridation Information Network


One comment on “Re your 14-year-old grandson who has 12 ‘fillings’ that need attention

  1. Thanks Ailsa B AFIN for the above letter.

    I would like to add:-

    The hazardous waste pollution of our water supplies, food chain and environment – this concerns us all – we must all demand that water fluoridation/pollution with hazardous waste, end as a matter of urgency and for all time.

    The people who don’t follow like sheep, do not believe anyone in the DENTAL INDUSTRY and their interests that the dumping/disposing into the water supplies and hence also contaminating our food chain of dangerously corrosive hazardous waste pollutants fluorosilicic acid/silicofluorides and co-contaminants of lead, mercury, arsenic, cadmium, etc., aka water fluoridation chemicals, is good for teeth, brains, organs and bodies – to believe this, you would need your ‘head read’.

    For the truth see REPORT Brief Overview of water fluoridation/pollution etc., hereunder; and remember, pro-fluoride fanatics will continue to say and do anything to keep the cities/states ‘fluoridated’ – and their Bovine Excreta of their untrue chant of it being safe and effective is willfully and recklessly negligent. Australia wide in dental crisis after widespread fluoridation in every State, first commencing Beaconsfield, Tasmania in 1953 = likewise USA in dental crisis after widespread ‘fluoridation’ first beginning in 1945 Grand Rapids Michigan.

    Water fluoridation/pollution with hazardous waste fluorosilicic acid/silicofluorides & co-contaminants of lead, mercury, arsenic, cadmium, etc. (plus they add aluminium sulphate to this hazardous waste soup) is not safe and not effective and all those continuing with this dangerous fraud of WF had better stop. No one has the right to treat, medicate, drug, chronically poison/pollute anyone especially by force and without informed consent (or refusal) or to pollute our food chain and environment).

    REPORT: Brief Overview of Water Fluoridation/Pollution – 11 September, 2013 Diane Drayton Buckland

    REPORT: 100% fluoridated Kentucky, USA – Rampant Dental Decay & chronic disease epidemic – DDB

    REPORT: Can Dentists & Doctors be trusted when they say Water Fluoridation is Safe & Effective?

    Some Health Effects:

    REPORT: Download Full Report >

    To quote Dr. Phillip R.N. Sutton, Formerly Academic Associate and Senior Research Fellow, Department Oral Medicine and Surgery, Dental School, University of Melbourne, Author of The Greatest Fraud: Fluoridation (1996):

    “We are all affected by this potentially dangerous fraud: The convincing of Governments and people generally that it is ethical, safe and beneficial to medicate, compulsorily, many millions of people throughout their lives with small but uncontrollable doses of a cumulative and very toxic substance because of the notion that it reduces the prevalence of dental decay. All this, although neither its safety nor any scientifically-proved reduction in the number of decayed teeth has been demonstrated.”


    From 1982 says it all:-

    1982 – Former NIH (National Inst. of Health) scientist opposed to fluoride
    Statement by James B. Patrick, Ph.D. at the Joint Congressional Committee on Health & Appropriations Against the Inclusion of Fluoridation in the Preventive Health & Health Services Block Grant, Held August 4, 1982.
    Dr. Patrick earned his B.S. from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology & his M.A. and Ph.D. from Harvard University majoring in chemistry. His experience as Antibiotics Research Scientist was with the National Institute of Health & Lederle Laboratories.
    Dr. Patrick is Senior Professor and Chairman of the Department of Chemistry, Mary Baldwin College, Stauton, Virginia, 1967 to date. He is author of 28 technical papers & holder of 7 U.S. patents.

    I strongly advise against the legislature of this Commonwealth having anything to do with fluoridation.

    It is a scientific disgrace that a well organized lobby of the American Dental Association ever managed to stampede American legislators into ignoring the highly technical but very cogent objection to fluoridation.


    Also let us clarify something regarding FLUORIDE ACTION NETWORK (Professor Paul Connett) website – FAN seeks to broaden awareness about the toxicity of fluoride compounds among citizens, scientists, and policymakers alike. FAN not only provides comprehensive and up-to-date information, but remains vigilant in monitoring government agency actions that impact the public’s exposure to fluoride.
I am sure many will be disturbed by the actions of the ADA and when this first happened some years ago, it certainly was disturbing to all Truth Seekers; the lengths to which some pro-fluoride fanatics go, in this case, please note that after Fluoride Action Network and the dot org domain was originally secured ( ) and before Fluoride Action Network could secure the domain name – that the American Dental Association (allegedly) deviously many say, swooped in and ‘nicked’ the domain name of Fluoride Action Network’s

    So to re-clarify this ‘interesting’ piece of pro-fluoride ‘manoeuvering’/deception by the ADA:-

    Fluoride Action Network Professor Paul Connett

    American Dental Association (who allegedly) ‘nicked’ the dot com

    I guess that’s a pretty effective way to impede people and researchers getting truth !

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s