Comment: ‘Michael Foley is a piece of work’

GENRE: CommentTO:  Various email Bcc list

AUTHOR: Sandra C

DATE SENT:   Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 5:26 PM

TITLE: Michael Foley is a piece of work

STATUS: Letters to Channel Seven, anyone?

UPDATES:  Please post all updates and comments in the LEAVE A REPLY section below.


DON’T KNOW WHETHER this show IS PURELY VICTORIA OR NOT – THESE SORT OF THINGS TECHNICALLY, ARE NOT MY ‘FORTE’ – between 4-5pm – certainly advertised as the only hour long news – Wednesday 21/8/13 around 4.30ish if you can find a podcast?

This is a NEW news show on Channel 7 with Melissa Doyle (used to be on morning show with Kochie)and Matthew White (was Today-Tonight).

Whilst he is on the ropes, we should insist on follow up.  Foley was alone, so I would think his off-sider (Professor Michael) Moore  is offended by previous mail he has received ??

I reckon we have a real chance here to give some truth.  It was said that after 70 years of fluoridation and 97% of Australia being fluoridated he very plausibly and calmly and believably stated he was worried that we would all suffer from dental problems (if fluoridation is ceased).

Foley got a huge emotional message out there that councils should not be making decisions and said State Governments should be doing so. (Foley) Advised Lismore will regret this, because there will be more dental caries etc.   We should ask for follow-up time. Or at the very least be writing to them from all over Australia and setting the information straight.

Mel was very good – her statement was ‘we will have to await the outcome won’t we?’

Whilst these two are in a new position, I reckon we have an opportunity, pointing out that Foley is a dentist and will benefit by dental damage – so why wouldn’t he be for fluoride?    The ‘systemic ingestion’ angle (as mis-information) needs be pushed???

I need help here.

Sandra C.  Geelong, Victoria


One comment on “Comment: ‘Michael Foley is a piece of work’

  1. I think this says it all:-
    Water Fluoridation an absolute fraud and failure:-
    Australia & USA in dental crisis after widespread fluoridation Australia wide for decades – Kentucky USA l00% fluoridated also in dental crisis & chronically diseased). Tasmania first fluoridated in 1953 worst dental health, in dental crisis & chronically diseased (as is Australia wide) – 27th February, 2013 – Tasmania will receive an extra $12 million from Federal Government to reduce public dental waiting lists.

    Dr Deborah Cole is chief executive officer of Dental Health Services Victoria.

    Geelong – fluoridated/polluted June, 2009
    GEELONG kids will have more to smile about thanks to a multi-million-dollar State Government plan to tackle tooth decay and gum disease. Health Minister launched the $14.9 million public dental plan, aimed at improving the oral health of young people across the state.


    NSW 96% ‘FLUORIDATED’ – Sydney since 1968 DENTAL CRISIS EXPOSES GREAT DIVIDE February 15, 2005
    Public dental health in NSW is in a state of serious neglect, with some patients waiting 8 years for attention & the number of children needing hospital treatment doubling over the past decade.

    50% of Children have tooth decay in Australia yet, Australia is almost fully fluoridated. How about we stop consuming sugar in everything, reduce dental costs,&educate children/people to daily oral healthcare instead of dumping industrial waste into water…..

    An Australian Example of Fluoridation Dictatorship

    2007 The Australian Fluoridation News – Is there a case of Government Fraud?

    REPORT: 100% fluoridated Kentucky, USA – Rampant Dental Decay & chronic disease epidemic – DDB

    Can Dentists & Doctors be trusted when they say Water Fluoridation is Safe & Effective?

    The only answer EVER was to provide access to affordable dental health care services for all the population, not the disposal of hazardous waste pollutants and co-contaminants known as water fluoridation; into our drinking water supplies and hence also the contamination of our food chain and using the populations’ kidneys as hazardous waste disposal/filtration units.

    Corporate `sponsorship` of our Dental Schools in Australian Universities is (allegedly) like leaving the wolves to mind the lambs. Allegedly, this is a most serious conflicts of interests and complete loss of integrity.

    The informed and independently researched/unbiased members of the population are sick of the fact that for decades the Fluoridation Lobby remain so politically powerful and media powerful – and that’s the only way these dangerously corrosive hazardous waste pollutants fluorosilicic acid/silicofluorides and co-contaminants of lead, mercury, arsenic, cadmium etc., (known as water fluoridation chemicals) continues to be disposed of into our drinking water supplies and hence also contaminating our food chain – the truth never gets to the people by way of headlines in a totally controlled corporate mainstream media – this is appalling.

    Also many of the population are still unaware because authorities lie and say the ‘fluoride’ is natural – this is absolutely deceptive and a cover-up.
    This is what they are consuming in their water, of course it’s all through the food chain, and they bath their babies, kids, themselves and their pets in these hazardous waste pollutants – we the population, pets and environment polluted with this hazardous waste known as water fluoridation.

    Ask yourselves, who in their right minds would force an entire population to consume this in everything we eat, drink and bathe in, also ask why would Dentists fight to the death to enforce this pollutant on us all & our environment if as they say it is effective at reducing dental decay by between 30 & 60% thus reducing their income. What BS !

    “Physiologic Conditions Affect Toxicity of Ingested Industrial Fluoride,” Journal of Environmental and Public Health, vol. 2013, Article ID 439490, 13 pages, 2013. Richard Sauerheber, doi:10.1155/2013/439490. Available online at:

    Fluoridation = What you are drinking, bathing in and it’s all through the food chain:-

    Hydrofluoric Acid – Acutely toxic chemical

    Explaining the truth about “water fluoridation” and the phosphate mining industry


    Fluosilicic Acid. TOXNET profile from Hazardous Substances Data Base

    Fluoride Class Action

    REPORT: 100% fluoridated Kentucky, USA – Rampant Dental Decay & chronic disease epidemic – DDB 

    Can Dentists & Doctors be trusted when they say Water Fluoridation is Safe & Effective?

    To quote Dr. Phillip R.N. Sutton, Formerly Academic Associate and Senior Research Fellow, Department Oral Medicine and Surgery, Dental School, University of Melbourne, Author of The Greatest Fraud: Fluoridation (1996):

    “We are all affected by this potentially dangerous fraud: The convincing of Governments and people generally that it is ethical, safe and beneficial to medicate, compulsorily, many millions of people throughout their lives with small but uncontrollable doses of a cumulative and very toxic substance because of the notion that it reduces the prevalence of dental decay. All this, although neither its safety nor any scientifically-proved reduction in the number of decayed teeth has been demonstrated.”
    Corporate `sponsorship` of our Dental Schools in Australian Universities is (allegedly) like leaving the wolves to mind the lambs. Allegedly, this is a most serious conflicts of interests and complete loss of integrity.

    ** The Australian Research Centre for Population Oral Health, School of Dentistry, The University of Adelaide. S.A. ** Same School of Dentistry, The University of Adelaide, S.A. Colgate Australian Clinical Dental Research Centre (CACDRC)
    An Australian Example of Fluoridation Dictatorship 

    2007   The Australian Fluoridation News – Is there a case of Government Fraud? 
    Australian Government removed Toothpaste S5 poison labels !
    Fluoride toothpaste was registered as a S5 poison
    The N.H.M.R.C. in their book “The Effectiveness of Water Fluoridation” p.131., explained the need to examine poison regulations concerning fluoride toothpaste which was registered as an ‘ S5 POISON’ as printed on the package.
    The Answer by N.H.M.R.C.
    Fluoride Toothpaste an S5 poison was reclassified as “Cosmetic for sales regulations”.
    Here we have the Australian Government’s professional and honest sorcery of changing an S5 POISON into a safe benign product by altering its scientific health category into a cosmetic by reclassification!
    S5 Poison labels on fluoride toothpaste removed to help commercial sales.
    All S5 POISON LABELS on fluoride toothpaste were removed, not for your health reason, no, it was to help commercial SALES that superceded the health and rightful Government protection of Australian people.

    The continuing fraud of water fluoridation/pollution is obscene:
    Fluoridation & The Web Of Deceit – Conflicts of Interests

    The Girl Against Fluoride Independent Researcher and Activist – Ireland –
    Professor Denis O Mullane is Vice Chairperson of the Executive Committee of the Irish Expert Body of fluorides & health. Although he calls himself “an independent objective research worker in the field of Dental Public Health”, this man has promoted water fluoridation around the world for many years. He has pushed water fluoridation in South Africa along with Seamus Hickey.
    Despite Mr Mullane’s pro fluoride bias, in 2002 Michael Martin gave him a grant estimated at a million to investigate the benefits and risks of water fluoridation.

    The British Fluoridation Society includes Denis Mullane in their information leaflets. He is also connected with the British Nutrition Foundation – this was set up in the 1960’s by sugar & pharmaceutical companies such as Tate and Lyle ltd, Cadburys, Proctor & Gamble. Denis Mullane’s uncle was chief chemist of Irish Sugar Company.

    Mr Mullane is part of a group rewriting a document on “Fluorides and Oral Health”, for the WHO. This is one of the men who continues to say that water fluoridation is safe & yet the chemicals used in water fluoridation in Ireland were banned for their use as a wood preservative.

Print version ISSN 0042-9686
Bull World Health Organ vol.83 no.9 Genebra Sept. 2005  
The effective use of fluorides in public health
Sheila JonesI,1; Brian A. BurtII; Poul Erik PetersenIII; Michael A. LennonIV
British Fluoridation Society, Ward 4, Booth Hall Children’s Hospital, Charlestown Road, Manchester M9 7AA, England 
IIDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, USA 
IIIOral Health Programme, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland 
IVDepartment of Oral Health and Development, School of Clinical Dentistry, University of Sheffield, England
Competing interests: Sheila Jones is a paid officer of the British Fluoridation Society – a not-for-profit organization funded largely by United Kingdom government health promotion grants to support water fluoridation initiatives. Michael A. Lennon is unpaid Chairman of the British Fluoridation Society.
Censored! The British Fluoridation Society’s attempt to suppress information.
How the Dental profession and the BFS tried to silence inconvenient evidence. Doug Cross, 15 June, 2009.


    UK Government Health Departments fund the British Fluoridation Society

    It is a scientific disgrace that a well organized lobby of the American Dental Association ever managed to stampede American legislators into ignoring the highly technical but very cogent objection to fluoridation.
    Full Document:

    Dentists have Controlled CDC’s Water Fluoridation Stance for over 35 Years…
    Documents released under the Freedom of Information Act show that since the 1970’s, the dental health professionals in the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) have completely controlled the agency’s stance supporting water fluoridation.  No CDC toxicologists, minority health professionals, experts in diabetes, or others outside the Oral Health Division had any input into the agency’s position.
    The documents have drawn attention once again to the CDC’s and EPA’s fluoride safety statements, which appear at odds with current scientific knowledge.
    According to the Fluoride Action Network:  “Law firms are now reviewing old and new documents believed to highlight a pattern of attempts to curtail discussions on fluoride toxicity and downplay the importance of professionals personally reviewing scientific reports about fluorides.”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s