GENRE: Email outcome – request/response
TO: Commonwealth Ombudsman ie. Ombudsman.North@ombudsman.gov.au
AUTHOR: TGA (Therapeutic Goods Administration)
DATE RECEIVED: Fri, May 24, 2013 at 3:23 PM
TITLE: OMBUDSMAN OUTCOME: Your complaint – 2013-104689
STATUS: Ombudsman has stated this case is now closed.
UPDATES: Please place any updates into the COMMENTS section below
EXTERNAL LINK: Ombudsmen REPLY to Mr T Letter
Date: 24/05/2013 3:10:16 PM
To: Mr John T
Subject: Your complaint – 2013-104689
Dear Mr T
Attached, please find the outcome to your complaint.
Assisting the Australian community by resolving complaints and fostering good government administration.
RESPONSE Ombudsmen REPLY to Mr T Letter
TWO COMMENTS by members of public
NB. ASWLA Disclaimer: The public is entitled to know the outcome of this (closed) enquiry, as it affects all those ingesting fluoridated water – therefore, the public are entitled to their opinions – ASWLA is not legally bound to these opinions – simply the messenger (ie. so don’t shoot the messenger) of public thought (but, you are welcome to add further comments in the comments section below):
“ The Ombudsman maintains he cannot investigate this complaint because he seems to believe the TGA is “above suspicion”, being a respected and trusted Agency that applies the law correctly in its dealings with testing therapeutic goods. This is just another example of the way fluoride is protected from scrutiny and the suppliers continue to poison this nation. The more I think about this the more I really do believe the corruption is so deep and the amounts of money involved make it impossible for those being poisoned to do anything to protect themselves. It is truly a sad state of affairs.”
“There is nothing here that should not be in the public arena. It will make it clear to others there is no point in seeking assistance from this so called ‘watchdog’. It is just another example of how deep the corruption is. It is apparent the TGA is untouchable and can interpret its legal obligations any way it likes without scrutiny. “