GENRE: Email letter
TO: Dentist Sharon Telford
AUTHOR: Diane Drayton Buckland / Daniel Z
DATE SENT: Fri, May 17, 2013 at 11:07 AM
TITLE: Dentist Telford, Rockhampton – Three Cheers for Rockhampton Regional Council & 13 other Queensland Councils – A follow-up on the rebuttal of Dentist Sharon Telford’s claims: Rockhampton, Queensland
STATUS: Awaiting response
UPDATES: Any updates should be posted in the comments section below
Dentist Telford, Rockhampton – Three Cheers for Rockhampton Regional Council & 13 other Queensland Councils – A follow-up on the rebuttal of Dentist Sharon Telford’s claims: Rockhampton, Queensland
Dear Dentist Telford,
Three Cheers for Rockhampton Regional Council and the 13 other Queensland Councils who have the ethics, integrity, honor, decency and backbone to take action to end the chronic poisoning of their population – caring for the health and safety of the population, pets and environment by refusing to add dangerously corrosive hazardous waste pollutants from phosphate fertilizer industries fluorosilicic acid/silicofluorides and co-contaminants of lead, mercury, arsenic, cadmium, etc., and you are screaming foul ?! ! You must be blinded by the Dollar signs of Dentistry !
The population who have performed independent and unbiased research are becoming more aware of this long standing and obscene fluoridation dictatorship/fraud and are outraged that the Dental Pro-fluoridation Lobby have so much political power, clout and control that it continues to this day and the informed members of the population have had an absolute gut full of the Fluoridation Web of Deception/Propaganda/Fraud.
Water Fluoridation = pollution with hazardous waste is an absolute Fraud – it is not safe and not effective. I have added to Mr. Zalec’s email, please read it and learn. Dentists have no where to run now with Australia in dental crisis after decades of consuming this pollutant known as ‘water fluoridation’ in everything we eat and drink and bathe in and the USA in dental crisis also after first commencing the chronic poisoning of their population in Grand Rapids Michigan in 1945 and yes, they are in dental crisis also.
This first and foremost should scare the hell out of you as we already have Alzheimer’s Disease Crisis (not to mention kidney disease crisis using the populations’ kidneys as hazardous waste disposal/filtration units) – please examine Mr. Cross’ CV and learn more truth.
We (and our loved ones and pets) are consuming this neurotoxic, toxic & carcinogenic hazardous waste in everything we eat, drink and we have to bathe in it – and polluting our environment with it – and for Dentists and Doctors to still be demanding this be in the water supplies, well there is something seriously wrong there !!
ALZHEIMER’S DISEASE – Epidemic – Fluoride/Aluminium – By Doug Cross
In addition to the fluorosilicic acid/silicofluorides (hazardous waste pollutants and co-contaminants of lead, mercury, arsenic, cadmium, etc., known as ‘fluoride’) they also add aluminium sulphate
Australia already faces Alzheimer’s Disease (& Kidney disease) epidemics – STOP ‘WATER POLLUTION/FLUORIDATION’ immediately permanently & irrevocably for all time or face the ruin.
Dementia, including Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) is fast becoming the greatest public health issue, ever. In the UK the Alzheimer’s Society recently stated that one in three persons over the age of 65 will die from AD – and it’s increasing so fast that in thirty years time the prevalence is expected to treble (do the maths and shiver!). Your children will live with fluorosis, but they will die with dementia.
Since the evidence that environmental exposure to ionic aluminium salts, such as the aluminium sulphate used in water treatment, is a leading cause of AD. There is a 50% and 150% increase in AD in areas where the water contains only half the permitted maximum of 0.2ppm. Fluoride in water – increases the speed at which it is absorbed and transferred to the brain. Adding Fluoride To Drinking Water Is Literally Insane. Fluoridation is bad on its own, but in the presence of aluminium its effects are becoming catastrophic as our ‘aluminium clocks’ tick away the countdown to Alzheimer’s – fluoride speeds up that lethal clock..
By Doug Cross UKCAF http://ukcaf.org/
Please read on- numerous additons to Mr. Zalec’s email.
Regards, Diane Drayton Buckland, Queensland
Date: 16 May 2013 18:34
Subject: A follow-up on the rebuttal of Dr Sharon Telford’s claims:
Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com,firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org,email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.orgRE: http://www.themorningbulletin.com.au/news/dentists-want-fluoride-to-stay-rockhampton-water/1868102/Dear Council, et al,One of my contacts in the Bcc line replied to my original email, saying I should have been more specific in my original rebuttal of Dr. Telford’s flawed claims. So I am writing this email in an attempt to remedy this.
RE: “The reason European countries have taken it out was because of crazy old water systems in the Eastern bloc.”
Utter garbage! Does Dr. Telford expect us to believe that the world-renowned, genius engineers of Germany (1), cannot figure out how to build low-rank fluoridation plants? Give me a break! But it gets worse, for Dr. Telford, that is. For instance, as noted in the British Medical Journal, “In the Swiss canton of Basel-Stadt, the fluoridation scheme was withdrawn in 2003 after 41 years of operation because other measures were of “comparable effectiveness” to “compulsory medication” (2). And with great pleasure, I drive the nail deeper into Dr. Telford’s claim, by quoting Nobel Prize for Medicine winner, Dr. Arvid Carlsson: “Sweden rejected fluoridation in the 1970s” (3). But I can’t stop there. Belgium: “The main reason for that is the fundamental position of the drinking water sector that it is not its task to deliver medicinal treatment to people.” Finland: “Water suppliers, naturally, have always been against dosing of fluoride chemicals into water.” France: “Fluoride chemicals are not included in the list [of ‘chemicals for drinking water treatment’]. This is due to ethical as well as medical considerations.” Germany: “Generally, in Germany fluoridation of drinking water is forbidden. The relevant German law allows exceptions to the fluoridation ban on application. The argumentation of the Federal Ministry of Health against a general permission of fluoridation of drinking water is the problematic nature of compuls[ory] medication.” Luxembourg: “Water isn’t the suitable way for medicinal treatment and that people needing an addition of fluoride candecide by their own to use the most appropriate way.” (4) (5). Oh, I’ve had enough now, I’m bored. Moving onto the next point…
RE: “Fluoridating water systems would have cost billions, so instead they fluoridated salt to make it more cost effective.”
More PR spin garbage. I re-state my original point on this one: Although some European countries allow salt fluoridation, most do not. Only five western European countries have any salt fluoridation. (Milk fluoridation is only used in very small pockets in Europe, reaching less than 1% of the European population.) On the Fluoride Action Network website, a complete list of which countries fluoridate their water and salt is provided, along with thelatest tooth decay data from the World Health Organization (6). As this data shows, countries with no water and no salt fluoridation (e.g., Denmark, the Netherlands) have just as low, or lower, tooth decay rates than countries with widespread water and/or salt fluoridation programs (e.g., Germany and Switzerland) (7) (8).
RE: “Dr Sharon Telford said it was a “terrible decision” and would result in decreased oral health. Her comments echoed those of Dr John Christensen who said throughout the world fluoride was seen as one of the greatest ever public health benefits.”
Please, someone call a garbage truck. My computer can’t handle the workload! “In 1999, the Department of Health in England commissioned the centre for reviews and dissemination at the University of York to systematically review the evidence on the effects of water fluoridation on dental health and to look for evidence of harm… Given the certainty with which water fluoridation has been promoted and opposed, and the large number (around 3200) of research papers identified, the reviewers were surprised by the poor quality of the evidence and the uncertainty surrounding the beneficial and adverse effects of fluoridation (2).” Don’t believe the British Medical Journal on this, examine the words of the York authors themselves: “We were unable to discover any reliable good-quality evidence in the fluoridation literature world-wide” (9); “Given the level of interest surrounding the issue of public water fluoridation, it is surprising to find that little high quality research has been undertaken” (10). The evidence for the “benefits” of ingesting fluoride is of a pathetic quality (11) (12), but I suppose these local dentists are fans of recycling, because as they seem to know, it’s all about how one sorts one’s garbage into the right bins. One of the “greatest ever public health benefits,” Dr. Christensen? Let’s examine that little turd of a claim, shall we? – “Not a day goes by without someone in the world citing the CDC’s statement that fluoridation is “One of the top ten public health achievements of the 20th Century”… Those that cite this probably have no idea how incredibly poor the analysis was that supported this statement. The report was not externally peer reviewed, was six years out of date on health studies and the graphical evidence it offered to support the effectiveness of fluoridation was laughable and easily refuted” (13).
Dr. Telford, Dr. Christensen, keep dentistry in the dental chair, where it belongs. You are both a traveling joke shop, but no one is laughing (well, okay, I admit… I am ). And please, don’t even think about dragging out the toilet paper worthy NHMRC review (14), because I can’t handle the laughter any longer. My gut is about to split.
Rejection of Fluoridation of Drinking Water