GENRE: Email outcome – request/response
TO: Clementine Norton – Fraser Coast Chronicle
AUTHOR: John T
DATE SENT: Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 12:50 PM
TITLE: Fluoride Fraud – Dear Clementine
STATUS: No response
UPDATES: Please post all updates and comments in the LEAVE A REPLY section below.
ATTACHMENTS: 4 x attachments (at bottom of letter)
To: email@example.com RE: http://www.frasercoastchronicle.com.au/news/fluoride-decision-for-greater-minds/1756618/
I was appalled and shocked by your editorial, claiming you are still not convinced fluoride is harmful.
After reading the book, The Fluoride Deception, you must understand that the fluoride going into the reticulated water supply is highly hazardous industrial grade fluoride chemical waste streams, and that the EPA will not allow this poison to be dumped into the oceans? See letter sent to me by NSW EPA.
The attached Orica Safety Data Sheet is undeniable proof the additive is nothing more than a highly hazardous chemical and does not occur naturally in nature. Once you have had an opportunity to examine this data, ask yourself:
Do I want to ingest this poison every time I have a glass of water, a cup of coffee; use it for cooking, eat it through the food chain, bath in it and expose my loved ones and the unsuspecting public to this systematic poisoning of themselves and their environment?
Once this poison is added to the reticulated water supply it is so contaminated, it is not fit to drink or bath in. This is because it contains, apart from the fluoride chemical waste streams, very dangerous heavy metals such as lead, arsenic, mercury, aluminium, cadmium, copper, etc.. But don’t take my word for it, just examine the attached reticulated water quality data sheet from the Shoalhaven Council where I live. Yet this Council still has the audacity to claim they have “best practice” water quality. This can only be classed as insanity.
If you still consider it is good to expose the public including little babies, children and pregnant women, those with allergies and chemical sensitivities and those with impaired kidney function to this forced medication of an unapproved and untested drug (S6 and S7 Poison Fluorosilicic acid/silicofluorides and co-contaminants) then I seriously must question your motives for writing such an editorial
Might I suggest you read this book if you want to know more about the fluoride fraud.
You can also learn more about the side effects of Sodium Fluoride and Sodium Silicafluoride by referring to the attached document Concerns with Fluoridation of Australians.