GENRE: Email letter
TO: Senators Norris and Quinn
AUTHOR: Roy S
DATE SENT: Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 9:28 AM
TITLE: Your valiant stand against fluoridation
STATUS: Awaiting response
UPDATES: Any updates should be posted in the comments section below
To: email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org
Dear Senators Norris and Quinn,
I would like to add my voice to the chorus of approval, worldwide, for the stand you have taken to draw attention of your people to the mistake of forced fluoridation of public drinking water.
I could present supporting arguments for your stand but none better than your own Declan Waugh and the indomitable Paul Connett in America. I attach, for emphasis an extract of a series of questions that Paul suggests you consider and present to your constituents, that generally leave fluoridation proponents speechless.
[ASWLA has inserted a document: Paul Connett wrote analysis of the fluoridation failure of the past 68 years ]
It is my view that fluoridation of public drinking water is bad science, bad ethics, bad law and bad medicine. It is a condition that generally only seems to afflict people whose first language is English. Hence you should ask yourself: where and when did it all start; qui bono; who would be embarrassed if it were shown to be fraudulent?
It is one of the four greatest medical frauds of the twentieth century and continues today.
Roy Schrieke, PhD (Chemistry)