GENRE: Email letter
TITLE: Response to ‘EDITORIAL: Case for fluoride overwhelming’ DZ
AUTHOR: Daniel Z
DATE WRITTEN: Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 5:12 PM
STATUS: No response, as of 1st January, 2013
UPDATES: Any updates should be posted in the comments section below.
FURTHER READING: The Case Against Fluoride (Connett, Beck, Micklem)(2010)
Bcc: Various lists
You like to refer to Queensland as being somehow backwards for not adopting water fluoridation sooner; and now, not continuing to have the practice mandated by the State Government. It seems that you are the one behind the times. We’ve been taking the piss out of your ilk for ages:
In fact, your tactics are even more pathetic than those used by fluoridation promoters/cronies down south. But just to let you know, we’ve also been watching Queensland over the years:
It seems the Queensland people, based on the latest trend away from State Government mandatory fluoridation laws, are waking up to the fraud of fluoridation. Only YOU, Editor, and your ridiculous gang of ‘Yes Men’ morons, insist on pissing into the wind.
I suggest you buy yourself a Christmas gift: http://www.chelseagreen.com/bookstore/item/the_case_against_fluoride
Daniel Z | Independent Researcher